A science administrator is analyzing grant proposals from three institutions. Institution A requests $1.2 million over 4 years, Institution B requests $2.1 million over 6 years, and Institution C requests $900,000 over 3 years. To compare proposal durations, the administrator converts all requests into annualized amounts. What is the highest annual funding value, in dollars, when annualized using the longest project duration as the reference?

Wed, 06 May 2026 12:08:44 +0000

A science administrator is analyzing grant proposals from three institutions, each seeking funding over differing durations. Institution A requests $1.2 million over four years, Institution B $2.1 million over six years, and Institution C $900,000 over three years. With shifting priorities in research-institute collaboration and funding efficiency, comparing proposal timelines help administrators assess sustainable investment rather than short-term outlays. Annualized funding values offer a clearer view of yearly budget impact, especially when aligning with long-term research goals. This approach supports smarter, data-driven decisions—without sacrificing clarity or professionalism. ### Conversion Basics Under the Longest Duration Rule To fairly compare multi-year grant requests, annualized funding uses the project’s full duration as the time benchmark. This accounts for gradual spending, oversight, and impact, avoiding skewed comparisons based on shorter or longer timelines alone. The longest duration—six years in this case—serves as the reference period, ensuring the analysis reflects the most extended timeframe. Annualized values enable administrators to identify which proposals demand consistent yearly support and which offer concentrated investment. ### Annualized Funding Calculation Breakdown