Question: A science policy analyst must distribute 6 identical funding grants to 4 distinct research teams, with each team receiving at least 1 grant. How many ways can this be done?

Sun, 03 May 2026 14:43:22 +0000

**How a Science Policy Analyst Can Distribute Limited Funding Equitably: Insights and Solutions** What drives innovation in American science? Behind every major breakthrough often lies strategic investment—and fair distribution. A question that matters now: How many fair ways can a science policy analyst allocate exactly 6 identical funding grants among 4 distinct research teams, ensuring each receives at least one? This isn’t just a math problem—it reflects how limited public resources are shared with care and precision. With growing interest in equitable resource planning and evidence-based decision-making, understanding how to distribute limited grants transparently is critical for policymakers, researchers, and anyone invested in America’s scientific future. ### Why Distribution Matters: Trends Shaping Grant Allocation In a year defined by innovation investment, equitable funding distribution is gaining traction across sectors. Recent national discussions emphasize maximizing impact while avoiding inequality—ensuring every team, regardless of size or origin, has a fair chance. This matters not only for fairness, but for fostering diverse perspectives and maximizing research output. Policymakers face real challenges: limited budgets, rising demand for scientific advancement, and the need to measure good use of public funds. In this context, solving how to fairly divide finite grants becomes a cornerstone of responsible science leadership. The question — How many distinct ways can 6 identical grants be shared among 4 research teams, each getting at least one?— stands at the heart of informed decision-making.