#### 9Question: A science policy analyst is reviewing 8 proposed initiatives, 3 of which are high-impact. How many ways can they select 5 initiatives to prioritize if at least 2 of the selected must be high-impact?

Sun, 03 May 2026 14:43:22 +0000

### How Many Ways Can a Science Policy Analyst Choose 5 Initiatives When At Least 2 Must Be High-Impact? In an era where innovation shapes national progress, science policy analysts face growing pressure to identify top priorities amid competing demands. With 8 proposed initiatives under review—just 3 classified as high-impact—how can decision-makers balance ambition with practicality? This question is not just statistical; it’s central to how public resources are directed to drive sustainable change. For policy professionals and stakeholders tracking emerging priorities, understanding the combinations that meet key thresholds offers clarity and confidence in selection. #### Why Are High-Impact Initiatives Gaining Attention? Across the U.S., investment in science and technology initiatives has surged, driven by national competitiveness, climate resilience, and public health needs. High-impact programs often address pressing challenges—climate adaptation, emerging technologies, or biomedical breakthroughs—where strategic focus can multiply outcomes. As awareness grows around metrics like scalability, societal benefit, and ROI, selecting the most promising initiatives becomes essential. Stakeholders increasingly ask: How many ways exist to prioritize 5 initiatives when at least 2 must be high-impact, ensuring momentum without overextending limited resources?